Opponent’s reply
The basic argument against the Left about public expenditure and state intervention provided by the proponent is based on an old debate dating back at least to the days of John Maynard Keynes and not always associated with ‘Marxist ideology’. It is indeed intriguing to only call the Left as the proponent of state intervention although I would argue that this policy of state intervention is correct. Thus the Left is right in terms of taking right issues, agendas, policies (here ‘right’ is meant as ‘correct’ and ‘ethical’). When the neoliberal economics is currently being discredited in the western advanced capitalist countries with a call for state intervention in the midst of global economic recession, the Keynesian economics that actually saved capitalism from its own crisis has been forgotten by the proponent. The entire argument against rising fiscal deficit hinges on the fundamental premise that it will raise the rate of interest and hence will adversely affect investment. Keynes had pointed out long ago that this assumes full-employment of labour and resources. However, in a country like India, anybody who assumes the above premise is surely wrong, since in India, we have large scale unemployment. On the other hand, in a situation of unemployment and unutilized capacity, if the fiscal deficit is actually increased, then it generates a higher level of income via the multiplier effect and generates an equal amount of savings and result into further investment. In other words, the argument against fiscal deficit in times of unemployment is incorrect. Read the rest of this entry »